Millennials Are Destroying Banks, And It’s The Banks’ Fault

Millennials are rejecting home ownership across the land. Millennials aren’t buying crap anymore, destroying businesses that, well, sell crap. Millennials are changing the workplace to be, I kid you not, more friendly to “millennial values.” Millennials this, millennials that, and those are just some of the stories published this week on this critical, hot-button issue.

Frankly, as a millennial, I’d like to copyright the term and earn a royalty every time it is uttered. Like that Happy Birthday song.

I hate this generational garbage as much as the next person, but there is a kernel of truth that people born in the same years face similar contexts in their lives. My generation witnessed 9/11 and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq at a very formative age, and we were hit with the global financial crisis right as we were expected to get started in the workforce. That colors your worldview.

Few industries will face a greater struggle targeting these new consumers than banks, who seem wholly unprepared with what to do with us. Indeed, if ever there was a dark evil in the world that millennials as a whole would probably like to see completely destroyed like San Francisco in San Andreas, it is the banking industry.

The banks aren’t ignorant. Jamie Dimon, the head honcho of JPMorgan Chase, told shareholders this year that “Silicon Valley is coming” with “hundreds of startups” providing alternatives to traditional banking services.

Banks are here to stay – for now. It is clear though that startups, often led by millennials and ushering in millennials as early adopters, are coming for the heart of the banking industry. How it responds will determine who owns the capital of the most important capitalist country in the world.

The Changing Financial Desires Of Millennials

Every generation has its financial goals. For much of the past few decades, the goals have been independence through home and car ownership along with a growing retirement account to supplement Social Security and pensions.

Not surprisingly, banks have catered to these desires with a bevy of products, including vastly increased mortgage lending (in fact, increasing to the point of catastrophe as we recently witnessed) along with home-equity loans, investment and retirement advisors, and a customer service relationship centered on local branches.

Millennials have entirely different life goals, and yet, financial institutions have yet to respond with the kinds of products needed to satiate them. Just to start, this generation has the greatest levels of student debt in the country’s history. That means that almost all the products currently offered by banks are mostly irrelevant, since major purchases like homes will be pushed back, perhaps indefinitely.

Amazingly, we have seen almost no innovation in student loan lending from the traditional banks, while there has been tremendous innovation in the market from startups like SoFi, Earnest, CommonBond, among others. What gives? Imagine if the first thing a traditional bank said to a college graduate and potential new customer was “open an account, and we can can help you refinance your student loans with a lower rate and save serious dollars during repayment.”

I’ll talk about customer service in a moment, but it is clear that there is a gaping hole in the market here that the traditional banks seem all but blind to.

That said, big banks have been a bit more engaged around improving investment advising. Many now offer automated investment accounts directly or through contracted brokerages, just like fintech startups Wealthfront or Betterment. These tools have traditionally targeted millennials, who seem more comfortable with computers handling their money and who also desire a well-balanced investment portfolio (we did survive that global financial crisis after all).

There are all kinds of other financial products that traditional banks should be engaging with. Newer models of credit scores, like those from Affirm, could greatly help younger workers find loans. RobinHood and others are trying to show that stock trading fees are obsolete. Banks have so many opportunities to engage with millennials, it is disappointing to see how much they have ignored this demographic.

That Said, Please Don’t Talk With Us

Yes, we want banks to engage with us, but no, please don’t talk with us. I have only once ever walked out of a bank branch as a completely satisfied customer (this trip may also have involved free candy). Automated investment platforms are not just popular due to their lower fees and balanced risks, but also because traditional investment advisors had no fricking idea what they were selling (yet somehow still became rich in the process).

Traditional banks have moved many of their banking functions online or at least to ATMs, since every in-person transaction has a significant cost attached to it. But so far, none of them has developed the user experience and product quality necessary to really take full advantage of mobile and the web for banking.

Simple Bank, the startup acquired last year by BBVA, tried to reach a point where everything could be done through mobile. They missed the mark, but the potential is still there. With Nimbl acting as a “Uber for ATMs” and several other new startup banking services, this dream seems much less far-fetched than it did just a year or two ago.

I want a bank where absolutely everything can happen through my phone, and if I need help, I can ask a banker about something instantly through the click of a button. I want a concentrated set of services designed just for me, and not a menu with more than fifty options for services that aren’t even relevant for me.

I want to transfer money in ten seconds – not ten screens.

Along that simplicity theme, part of shedding all of these human touch points is also reducing the complexity of banking products. Every time I go to a bank, there is a rigamarole involved as we go through the new-account-type-of-the-month, each of course with their complex tiers of fees. I know this is designed to screw me, and I don’t like it. Simplicity is golden.

The Future Bank For Everyone

Yes, millennials are annoying customers, but here is the irony: everyone wants these features. Consumers want to be able to manage their finances from their phones and tablets while limiting their visits to bank branches and bank tellers. Plus, everyone hates bank fees, particularly their lack of transparency and complexity.

The difference today is that millennials are willing to shop elsewhere, because we are simply not going to accept that these are the only products on the market. We are willing to try new startups and their innovations, since they speak our consumer language while the traditional banks do not.

If the big Wall Street banks fail in this new environment, it won’t be because they failed to bring millennials into the fold. It will be because they will have failed to innovate for all of their customers.

Featured Image: B Rosen/Flickr UNDER A CC BY-ND 2.0 LICENSE

from TechCrunch http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/WAP7eTEq98E/
via IFTTT

Berlin And Tel Aviv Should Work Better Together

Like many successful entrepreneurs, Eden became a business angel and later a VC after he sold Face.com to Facebook. Eden is a superstar, picks his companies wisely, and most of the startups supported by Eden’s Aleph VC get additional funding from various investors. But when I look at the backers of Aleph’s portfolio companies, it becomes clear that, aside from Israeli money, most of the venture capital here comes from the U.S. Take Meerkat whose majority 20-plus investors are American.

Stories like this made me wonder. There are a lot of startups in Israel that have an immense potential, while Berlin is full of venture capital looking for deal-flow. So why are there almost no European investors in success stories like Meerkat? Why do barely any Israeli startups consider European money? And looking at investors actively looking for deal-flow in Israel, where is Berlin’s Early Bird, Point Nine Capital, Atlantic Capital? Where are the London-based VCs that are most active in Berlin like Index Ventures or Accel Partners?

At the same time the Berlin investor community is eagerly looking for deal-flow as far away as Silicon Valley, when amazing companies are built just in front of our European noses. Israel is just three-and-a-half hours away. It’s as close to Berlin as Spain, and certainly much closer than America. From the perspective of a Berlin founder who got to know the Tel Aviv tech community, something here doesn’t make sense.

I ended up in Tel Aviv after the acquisition of our startup Xyo by an American corporate with a large office in Herzliya. Through this I’ve spent most of my time in Israel since October last year. I felt at home in Tel Aviv almost immediately. It looked like Berlin in summer, with the same cosmopolitan vibe, tons of startups and the same rundown streets and mess of a city that grew organically with immigration of young creatives from all over the world.

Also the startup ecosystems and venture capital scene are similar in both cities – both emerged about 15 years ago, and are equally mature in its development, with the first wave of large exits behind them, but still lots of very young founders.

With the majority of money here being American, Tel Aviv seems a little bit underfunded in early stages. No surprises there: Early-stage investors like to keep their companies close to them, and Silicon Valley is simply far away. With such exposure to U.S. venture capital, B and C rounds are common. On the ground, the most active investors are Sequoia, Carmel Ventures and Eric Schmidt’s Innovation Endeavours. Except for Aleph.vc, there seems to be a shortage of A and seed money, and many entrepreneurs complain about valuations in early stages.

Tel Aviv startups are often riding on the bleeding edge of tech and do not shy away from the most complicated problems of the industry. While Berlin’s CEOs come from Europe’s great business schools, however, it is not the university that produces the most amazing engineers in Israel, but the Israeli army.

The Intelligence Unit 8200 is the largest unit in the Israeli Defense Forces. It engages in intelligence activity partly through the use of advanced technology, and it has become a “university” for Israeli CTOs. Participation in Unit 8200 is one of the surest ways to a take-off to hold senior positions in high-tech or founding a successful startup. Several alumni of 8200 have gone on to found leading Israeli IT companies, including Waze, ICQ and Onavo.

Unlike Berlin, there is an overabundance of amazing CTOs, but often the founders I meet roll their eyes when asked about their go-to-market strategy, as if I was touching on some really boring point. There is an advantage and a disadvantage to it. The advantage is engineering talent is something that the whole world is striving for. The disadvantage is companies seem to be sold prematurely, in frequent asset or team-driven exits to large corporates that look to establish an R&D office in Israel.

In Berlin, to the contrary, the CEOs often don’t even have a CTO as co-founder but are able to market a to-do list as if it were the best invention since sliced bread. I wish to see Israeli CTOs join forces with Berlin CEOs to unlock the full potential of all the amazing tech that’s being built in Tel Aviv. I could imagine billion-dollar companies built this way.

Not only do I see the benefits of tightening this cooperation, but with 20,000 Israelis in Berlin, and more and more Berliners visiting Tel Aviv as an oasis of sun nearby, there is something natural about it. On both sides of the Mediterranean Sea, there are founders and investors willing to syndicate, exchange talent, and create another high-tech hub, an “EMEA Valley.”

“Berlin and Tel Aviv are just four hours apart, both are vibrant ecosystems with highly complementary skill sets, it is time to work closer together”, said Christophe Maire, Berlin’s most active super angel and early-stage VC, with companies like SoundCloud and EyeEm in his portfolio. As André Eggert, founding partner at leading Berlin startup law firm Lacore, who met a number of Israeli startups during his frequent holidays in Tel Aviv, said: “Berlin and Tel Aviv are equally vibrant and open to sharing experiences. I am impressed by the high standard TLV companies work on. Their focus on hardcore technology is something Berlin can benefit from.



from TechCrunch http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/eYIP58PTfYQ/
via IFTTT

YC Grad Yhat Scores $1.5M In Second Seed Round

When Yhat, the company that has developed solutions to help organize data scientist teams, graduated from the Y Combinator, winter 2015 class, the founders had a goal to raise a million dollars to keep growing the company when they returned to New York.

They may have aimed to low.  The team actually was able to raise $1.5 million in their oversubscribed round, thanks to the interest in their technology.

Being part of Y Combinator enabled the founders to meet people in Silicon Valley — really one of the goals when they applied. The company already had east coast finance connections, but the founders hoped to build a network in Silicon Valley too. Being part of YC opened the door to meeting the right people, Yhat CEO and co-founder Austin Ogilvie explained.

“Y Combinator was an excellent way to build a west coast network of entrepreneurs and experienced software investment operators,” he said.

The Post-YC financing objective was a $1 million raise and was mostly focused on meeting these  strategic west coast angel investors. In particular they hoped to attract enterprise SaaS executives.

And they found some good ones in Tikhon Bernstam, who co-founded Scribd and Parse; Ilya Sukhar, another Parse co-founder; and Justin Kan, who founded Twitch. These are experienced entrepreneurs and that’s precisely what Ogilvie and his co-founder Greg Lamp were hoping for.

In fact, they got a mix of over 20 investors, including several backers from the first seed round. Currently Yhat has 14 customers. Ogilvie joked that his company is “a mighty team of 9″ right now, but there are plans to expand.

The company doesn’t plan to sit still in the wake of Y Combinator, which he described as a whirlwind of activity.”The whole YC conclusion was overwhelming in a  good way, but I’m glad to be back and focussing all of my attention on my business,” Ogilvie said.

With money in hand, co-founder Lamp flew to New York to get more office space. Over the next six months, they plan to hire at least 4 new employees.

The company has two products at the moment, ScienceOps and ScienceBox. The former, as they explained to TechCrunch last winter, “they developed as a solution designed to help teams of data scientists work and communicate more effectively with one another as they built projects on top of popular data science tools like R and Python.”

“Largely that road map [for ScienceOps] is centered around the idea of helping enterprises, understand the efficacy of the predictive models they are using in day-to-day decision making,” Ogilvie explained.

This will allow customers to measure the quality of the rules and predictive models they are using for their business decisions. He offers these examples: “How good are my product recommendations today vs. last week vs. last year?” or “How is our newly minted credit scoring model performing and are we seeing those lower credit loss rates we expect?”

The next version of ScienceOps is in early beta with wider rollout expected some time in the third quarter this year. Early customers are giving favorable reports, he said.

ScienceBox was the second product and designed to help smaller teams of data scientists

Ogilvie also gave a glimpse of a future product that’s not quite ready for release called ScienceCluster. It will enable data science teams to build clusters made up of multiple servers. This will unleash power that should create entirely new use cases.

It’s a crazy, fast-growing market and it takes a lot of education to explain the products to large organizations, many of which are just beginning to dabble in data science, he says.

Yhat has some funds now to keep it going, but Ogilvie made it clear he’s in it for the long haul. He wants to see his company grow and develop into a much larger organization.



from TechCrunch http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/ZdFFGzHgIhE/
via IFTTT

Gillmor Gang: Medium Fries

The Gillmor Gang — Robert Scoble, Dan Farber, John Taschek, Kevin Marks, and Steve Gillmor. Recorded live Friday, May 29, 2015. Google I/O, cross-platform Web/App mashup, and more media meltdown. Situation Normal. Plus, the latest G3 (below) with Mary Hodder, Kristie Wells, Francine Hardaway, and Tina Gillmor.

@stevegillmor, @dbfarber, @scobleizer, @jtaschek, @kevinmarks

Produced and directed by Tina Chase Gillmor @tinagillmor

Liner Notes

Live chat stream

The Gillmor Gang on Facebook

G3: Press and Fold

G3 on Facebook



from TechCrunch http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/UWlk17LtFtg/
via IFTTT

A Look At The Future Of Shopping Inside A Startups Lab In This San Francisco Mall

Silicon Valley is full of big, disruptive ideas. Now a certain mall in downtown San Francisco would like to capitalize on some of that innovative gold in the hopes that it will bring online shopping into the physical realm. So it built a tech space for startups.

Bespoke is 35,000 square feet of co-working and event space with an open floor plan, comfy couches, startup offices, Rubik’s cubes and a bouldering wall up on the fourth floor of San Francisco’s Westfield Shopping Centre.

The idea is that those hawking e-commerce goods will be able to offer those products for shoppers to see, touch, and test in the real world. Westfield hopes this might help it figure out what the future of shopping could look like at the mall.

Some of the startups coworking, or participating in pop-up shops and other events include the product upvoting platform Product Hunt, crowdfunding site Indiegogo and personal shoe design startup Shoes of Prey. We took a peek inside on Bespoke’s opening day to find out more about this experiment in tech and shopping.

unnamed



from TechCrunch http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/EzPU3mUk-z8/
via IFTTT

The Founder And The Inferiority Complex

I’m a serial entrepreneur with an inferiority complex. I was diagnosed by an overly cheerful psychiatrist about a year ago as I was getting help for anxiety and depression, which were a result of this underlying disorder. This is how I’ve overcome it.

To start, there’s a difference between a healthy dose of doubt and an actual inferiority complex. The former is like a wise internal counselor providing you with handy life advice, such as, “That movie star doesn’t know you, and probably doesn’t want you to ask them out while they’re having dinner.” The latter is like having a nervous, yappy dog for an adviser, telling you, “They’re going to hate that report you spent days on, and every comment is actually about your intelligence, or body odor. Or both. Probably both.”

An inferiority complex can rob you of healthy relationships and eat away at your accomplishments. If you don’t deal with an inferiority complex, as with many mental health issues, you can find yourself in a downward spiral of unproductive behavior and self-recrimination.

A couple of years ago, I wrote a post about taking down my startup Altsie. Altsie was based on a new film distribution model that used bars and restaurants to release movies, screening them on HD projectors. People had a good time, and the truth is, Altsie was doing fine, as startups go. There were a few glitches, as you would expect, but audiences were growing in several locations and the quality of my films was increasing.

You don’t fall so hard without doing some serious personal introspection, or at least you shouldn’t.

Mental health issues manifest themselves differently in every person. For me, people’s attention can be incredibly painful, so much so that I feel drawn to destroy things I’ve created just to avoid potential judgment. To say this can set me back at times is an understatement.

I subconsciously sabotaged Altsie, putting obstacles in my own way: an unnecessarily pushed deadline, a phone call not made, money spent when it should have been saved, and saved when it should have been spent. The yappy dog kept barking — it thought I picked horrible films and needed a better website — and all I wanted was for it to shut up. And it did, finally, when I pulled Altsie down.

Afterwards, I spent a lot of time thinking about what went wrong. Was it the business model? No, that could have been optimized, but it was working. The locations I picked? No, I was in some of the most popular locations in town. Was it me?

Yeah …. probably.

You don’t fall so hard without doing some serious personal introspection, or at least you shouldn’t. I went to see a psychologist to get some help. Kicking my feet up on the leather couch, we dug through the mess of my subconscious, and let me tell you, it wasn’t a pretty sight. Mostly, it was embarrassing to find how I had internalized so many excuses for why my life was the way it was—why I felt the way I did.

I didn’t discover some primordial trigger event that explained why I kept stealing defeat from the jaws of victory — there was no abuse in my past, I wasn’t mistreated. Life had presented me with challenges, but everyone has obstacles and challenges. It was the way I reacted to these challenges that tripped me up. I was told that I had anxiety and depression and by not dealing with these problems for years I was making the issues worse. Where had they started? Who knows, but they weren’t going away by themselves.

With a tiny ember of knowledge about my own psyche, I created another startup. I wasn’t aiming for the stars with this product, I just wanted to make something people could use. Part of me knew that I didn’t really have my hands around my own problems yet, but another part of me thought that if I just got the right idea — if I just built the right product — I could skip the part where I actually worked on myself. I knew I had issues with anxiety, which was a big step.

And that should be enough, right? I get it! Let’s move on. We launched our new site, however, and my problems came roaring back. This time I was so bound up I couldn’t even tell people about the service I spent months creating. I froze, berating myself for weeks on end because I couldn’t do the simplest promotions, and things languished. Growth is not always straightforward. I thought that coming to the realization that I was causing my own problems would be enough, but it wasn’t.

Around that time, I went to see a psychiatrist. For the uninitiated: in mental health, going from a psychologist to a psychiatrist is like leveling up. In his thick German accent, my new doctor broke the news. “You have za inferiority complex!” He seemed rather pleased with himself, and who wouldn’t at $200 an hour? But he was right — this is where my anxiety and depression originated.

Does the actual diagnoses matter? Yes and no. It’s helpful because it lets me see patterns in my behavior, but it’s no silver bullet. I still have to work on the root of the problem. Biologically speaking, it turns out my amygdala is that yappy dog, startled into a flight-or-fight response at inappropriate moments, like when people pay attention to my startup. It’s actually a pretty physical process, and can be controlled with the right training.

But without that training, over time it wears me down and causes me to react in unproductive ways. It shapes the way I interact with the world, and the way I interact shapes my environment, creating a recursive loop that sustains the underlying issue.

Before, unhealthy scenarios would play out in my head for hours, if not days. Now, I can step back and watch my brain react, but I don’t feed the fire.

At the advice of the psychiatrist I started taking Escitalopram Oxalate, a serotonin uptake inhibitor. Taking a drug was enlightening because it manually shut down a chorus of negative voices in my head (a thousand yappy dogs). Until I took those pills, I was unaware how loud and constant those voices were. The most important thing the medication did was make me realize I didn’t have to live with that constant criticism, and it opened my eyes to the fact that many people don’t. Unfortunately, the medication also dulled my creativity and intelligence, and since I use these talents to make a living, I regretfully stopped taking them. For the record, I’m not anti-drug. If I could find a perfect concoction, I would take it. Until then.

With medication off the table, I tried other things. I knew that physical exercise tempered some of the symptoms, so I went overboard, training for and competing in a half-Ironman. I lost 30 pounds and I began feeling better (except for the shin splints). I started meditating at both a local meditation center and at home.

These days I rise at 5:30 to sit quietly, listen to my own breathing and gain some control over my thoughts. These exercises have trained me to see my brain react in real-time. Before, unhealthy scenarios would play out in my head for hours, if not days. Now, I can step back and watch my brain react, but I don’t feed the fire. Slowly, the flames are dying. The dog is shutting up.

The last thing I did was dig through the kitchen cabinets, gather the liquor bottles up, and toss them out. I stopped drinking, a decision that was neither straightforward nor easy. I don’t have a drinking problem, but alcohol makes maintaining mental health a little harder, and life is already tricky enough. It was a difficult decision — I like drinking. But I’ve found that my moods are more stable now, and my sleep is better. Good God, though, I miss Scotch.

I’m still trying to get my hands around my problems, but it’s a long, slow process. That’s doesn’t mean I’m going to stop and wait for everything to be perfect. I’ve got more projects brewing, and I’m trying not to repeat my past mistakes.

What I’ve learned, in the end, is that you need to treat your mental health like a startup. You just need a minimal viable product to get out the gate, from there you can spend time optimizing. You may need to bring in some experts to advise you. You will definitely be weaker in some areas than others. But if I hadn’t tried and failed at startups, I wouldn’t have learned what I needed to do right the next time, both in business and in health.

Featured Image: Ollyy/Shutterstock

from TechCrunch http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/tlD511He8ak/
via IFTTT

Take A Walk With Us Through Google I/O 2015

[unable to retrieve full-text content]IMG_0483 What’s it like to be at Google I/O? Here’s a walking tour of this year’s show floor at Moscone West, from registration all the way up to the inner den of the press room. Read More


from TechCrunch http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/tshPYb4tAk8/
via IFTTT